Harmonisation... 
Conferences
Proceedings
7th conference (Belgirate) |
Proceedings from the Harmonisation conference in Belgirate - on-line access
Harmonisation Home page
Web pages related to the 7th conference in Belgirate:
7th conference (overview)
On-line proceedings
Introductory address
Discussion: Harmonisation and model evaluation
Outcome of discussions
Closing discussion
Conference web site
See also:
Information on all "Harmonisation..." conferences
Previous conferences: Papers
Here is access to all papers of the proceedings from the 7th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes held in Belgirate, Italy, May 2001. These papers are extended abstracts, with a typical length of 5 pages. The papers are in PDF format.
You can retrieve papers by finding them in the list below, which is organised by session.
List of papers presented in Belgirate
|
(in PDF format) |
||||||||||||
|
On Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| 0.01 | 10 years of Harmonisation activities: The past, the
present, and the future
H.R. Olesen, National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark |
| 0.02 | DG-Env and Harmonisation
M. Wichmann-FiebigDG-Env, Brussels, Belgium |
|
Validation and inter-comparison of models; model evaluation methodology |
|
| 1.01 | Application of a methodology to validate atmospheric
dispersion models
H. Eleveld, RIVM, Laboratory of Radiatiion, Bilthoven, The Netherlands |
| 1.02 | User-oriented measures of effectiveness for the evaluation
of transport and dispersion models
S. Warner, N. Platt and J.F. HeagyInstitute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, VA, USA |
| 1.03 | DAM: Datasets for Atmospheric Modelling
S. Galmarini1, R. Bianconi2, R. Bellasio2 and G. Graziani1 1 JRC Environment Institute, Ispra, Italy 2 ENVIROWARE srl, Centro Direzionale Colleoni, Agrate Brianza, Italy |
| 1.04 | A PDF approach to processing the data of tracer experiments
for validation of the dispersion models
E. Genikhovich, E. Filatova, Main Geophysical Observatory, St. Petersburg, Russia |
| 1.05 | An approach to developing air quality models for
regulatory applications
A. Venkatram, College of Engineering, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA |
| 1.06 | A platform for model evaluation
H.R. Olesen, National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark |
| 1.07 | An intercomparison of the AERMOD, ADMS and ISC dispersion
models for regulatory applications
D.J. Hall1, A.M. Spanton1, F. Dunkerley3, M. Bennett2 and R.F. Griffiths2 1 Envirobods Ltd, Stevenage, Herts, UK 2 Environmental Technology Centre, Dept of Chemical Engineering, UMIST, UK 3 Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark |
| 1.08 | An intercomparison of the AERMOD, ADMS and ISC dispersion
models for regulatory applications: Dispersion over terrain
F. Dunkerley1, A.M. Spanton2, D.J. Hall2, M. Bennett3 and R.F. Griffiths3 1 Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark 2 Envirobods Ltd, Stevenage, Herts, UK 3 Environmental Technology Centre, Dept of Chemical Engineering, UMIST, UK |
| 1.09 | Comparison of photochemical models UAM-V and AIRQUAL
in Lyon area by PSA, Renault and TotalFinaElf
E. Cohen-Solal1, J.P. Boch2, O. Duclaux3, M. Feuilloley2, A. Henriet4, A. Jaecker-Voirol5, D. Le Breton2, K. Pajot4 and C. Puel2 1 Renault S.A., Antipollution et Fluides, Qualité d’air – modélisation, Guyancourt, France 2 TotalFinaElf 3 exp’air/TotalFinaElf 4 PSA Peugeot-Citroën 5 IFP |
| 1.10 | Comparison of concentration predictions, done by
different modellers for the same street canyon
W. Baechlin1, W.J. Mueller2 and A. Lohmeyer3 1 Lohmeyer Consulting Engineers, Karlsruhe, Germany 2 Niedersaechsisches Landesamt fuer Oekologie (NLOE), Hannover, Germany 3 Lohmeyer Consulting Engineers, Radebeul, Germany |
| 1.11 | Photochemical models application in the Po valley
(Italy): critical review and intercomparison
M. Deserti1, A. Kerschbaumer1, F. Desiato2, G. Brusasca3, C. Silibello3 and G. Zanini4 1 ARPA - Servizio Meteorologico Regionale 2 ANPA - National Environmental Agency, Italy 3 CESI4 ENEA – Centro Ricerche E. Clementel |
| 1.12 | Evaluation of the OSPM model against the data measured
during one year in Runeberg street, Helsinki
L. Wallenius1, J. Kukkonen1, A Karppinen1, J. Walden1, R. Kartastenpää1, T. Koskentalo2, P. Aarnio2 and R. Berkowicz3 1 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland 2 Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council, Helsinki, Finland 3 National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark |
| 1.13 | Validation of the French-German model for the treatment
of atmospheric dispersion in accidental release situations with experimental
data
M. Monfort1, O. Isnard1, R. Martens2 and H. Schnadt3 1 Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France 2 Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit, Cologne, Germany 3 Technischer Überwachungs-Verein Rheinland/Berlin-Brandenburg, Cologne, Germany |
| 1.14 | Comparison of roadside pollutant concentration modelling
using local and regional meteorological data
A.W. Reynolds, B.M. Broderick and D. Keating Air Quality Research Group, Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland |
| 1.15 | Comparison of the Jagtvej field data set with corresponding
wind tunnel results
M. Schatzmann1, C. Chauvet1, B. Leitl1, T. Glanert1, R. Berkowicz2, M. Ketzel2 and F. Palmgren2 1 Meteorological Institute, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 2 National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark |
| P.01 | Use of wind tunnel measurements for mathematical
model comparison and validation
A. Corti1, E. Canepa2 and M. Zanobini1 1 Dept of Energy « Sergio Stecco », University of Firenze, Italy 2 Dept of Physics, University of Genova, Italy |
| P.02 | WinDimula model evaluation with the Model Validation
Kit
G. Briganti1, S. Giarola2, G. Grippa2, G. Zanini3 and M.P. Kolarova3 1 ENEA Pisa, Italy 2 MAIND Srl, Milano, Italy 3 ENEA Bologna, Italy |
| P.03 | An evaluation method of the topographical effects
on exhaust gas dispersion using a personal computer version of a turbulent
dispersion model
Y. Ichikawa, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Tokyo, Japan |
| P.04 | Model evaluation of particle concentrations and
depositions due to a steel plant : Intercomparison of ISCST3 and CalpuffR.
Grimaldelli and S.P. Angius, Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell »Ambiente della Lombardia, Brescia, Italy |
| P.05 | Harmonizing domestic and reference software tools
for nuclear accident consequence assessment
D. Vamanu, D. Slavnicu, Gh. Mateescu and Al. Berinde‘Horia Hulubei’ National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania |
| P.06 | Validation of dispersion model of RTARC DSS based
on « Manno Validation Kit » field experiments
J. Dúran, Slovakia |
|
Regulatory Models: Country reviews |
|
| 2.01 | Impact assessment with the Belgium dispersion model
IFDM and the New Dutch National Model
G. Cosemans, M. Ruts and J. Kretzschmar, VITO, Mol, Belgium |
| 2.02 | Comparison of a gaussian (ISC3) and a langrangian
particle model (SPRAY) for regulatory applications in flat and complex
terrain sites representative of typical italian landscape
G. Brusasca1, G. Carboni2, S. Finardi1, D. Sanavio2, G. Tinarelli1 and A. Toppetti1 1 CESI, Ambiente, Segrate (Mi), Italy 2 ENEL/Prod, Piacenza, Italy |
| 2.03 | General lessons from the UK’s air quality review
and assessment process
D. Carruthers, C. McHugh, K. Simms, A. Stidworthy and J. Stocker CERC, Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants, Cambridge, UK |
| 2.04 | A nation-wide background air quality forecasting
system for the UKA.
J. Manning, A.L. Redington and D.B. Ryall, UK MetOffice, Bracknell, UK |
| 2.05 | Use of the FOCON96 calculation code in the analysis
of requests for authorisation of releases
A. Thomassin and A. Morin, Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France |
| 2.06 | Air pollution prevention using cleaner production
and burning optimisation
I. Melinte1, M. Balanescu1, E. Matei1, L. Popescu1, P. Stevenson2 and A. Baylay3 1 ICEM, Environmental Dept of Metallurgical Research, Bucharest, Romania 2 AEA Technology, ETSU, Harwell, UK 3 Field Study Council Environment Treading, Shrewsbury, UK |
| 2.07 | Development of atmospheric dispersion model for
environmental impact assessment of complicated industrial area
A. Kouchi1, K. Okabayashi1, S. Okamoto2, H. Yoshikado3, S. Yamamoto3, K. Kobayashi4 and M. Koizumi5 1 Nagasaki Research and Development Center, Nagasaki, Japan 2 Tokyo University of Information Science, Wakaba-ku, Chiba, Japan 3 National Inst. for Resources & Environment, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Japan 4 Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry, Taitoh-ku Tokyo, Japan 5 Suuri-keikaku CO Ltd, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo, Japan |
| 2.08 | Evaluation of the effect of the Ryazan’ electric
power plant on the environment and human health
V.P. Reshetin1, T.S. Zenich1, R.V. Arutyunyan2, V.V. Belikov2, V.P. Kiselev2, V.N. Semenov2 and D.N. Tokarchuk2 1 Institute of Radiation Physics and Chemistry Problems, National Academy of Science of Belarus, Sosny-Minsk, Belarus 2 Institute of Nuclear Safety of Academy of Science of Russia |
| 2.09 | Evaluation of possible air pollution levels from Elektrenai electric
power station with respect of alternative using of black mineral oil or
natural gas in its boilers after 2005 year
D. Perkauskas, Institute of Physics, Vilnius, Lithuania |
| P.01 | Real dispersion modelling for real regulators –
Case studies from Industry
M. Tasker, ICI Eutech Engineering Solutions, Warrinton, UK |
| P.02 | An application of the EU directive (April, 1999)
on relation to modelling accuracy
R.SanJosé, I Salas, J.L. Perez, A. Martìn, J.I. Pena, F. Maqueda and R. Suarez Environmental Sopftware and Modelling Group, Computer Science School, Technical University of Madrid , Spain |
|
Short Distance Dispersion Modelling |
|
| 3.01 | An application of a neural net filter to improve
the performance of an air pollution model
A. Pelliccioni1 and T. Tirabassi2 1 Ispesl-Dipia, Rome, Italy 2 ISAO-CNR, Bologna, Italy |
| 3.02 | A mixed spectral-similarity method for the estimation
of diffusion parameters
O. Isnard1, R. Martens2, M. Monfort1 and H. Schnadt3 1 Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France 2 Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit, Cologne, Germany 3 Technischer Überwachungs-Verein Rheinland/Berlin-Brandenburg, Cologne, Germany |
| 3.03 | A modelling system for the simulation of industrial
accidents
N. Quaranta1, A. De Martini1, R. Bellasio2, R. Bianconi2 and M. Marioni3 1 Ufficio Prevenzione Rischi, Protezione Civile, Regione Lombardia, Milano, Italy 2 ENVIROWARE srl, Centro Direzionale Colleoni, Agrate Brianza, Italy 3 TERRARIA SRL, Milano, Italy |
| 3.04 | Maximum ozone level prediction in Athens with the
aid of the CART system
K. Karatzas, A. Kaprara and N. Moussiopoulos, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece |
| 3.05 | Prediction of concentration fluctuations in short-distance
gas dispersion
M. Nielsen, H.E. Jørgensen and S. OttRisø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark |
| 3.06 | Worldwide data quality effects on PBL short-range regulatory air dispersion
models
J.L. Thé1, R.W. Brode2 and R. Lee3 1 Lakes Environmental Software, Waterloo, Canada 2 PES Inc, RTPO, NC, USA 3 Russell Lee and Associates, Durham, NC, USA |
| 3.07 | Simulation of terrain amplification factors for
annual concentration statistics using lagrangian particle dispersion model
W. Brücher, North Rhine-Westphalia State Environment Agency, Essen, Germany |
| 3.08 | Odour dispersion and fluctuation modelling with
a non-stationary lagrangian model
P. Boeker1, O. Wallenfang1, M. Wittkowski1, P Schulze Lammers1 and B. Diekmann2 1 University of Bonn, Institute for Agricultural Engineering, Bonn, Germany 2 University of Bonn, Institute for Physics, Bonn, Germany |
| 3.09 | A comparison of CALPUFF air quality simulation results
with monitoring data for Krakow Poland
J.S. Irwin1, J. Niedzia_ek2 and J. Burzy_ski3 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA 2 Malapolska State Inspectorate for Environmental Protection, Krakow, Poland 3 Institute of Meteorological and Water Management, Krakow, Poland |
| P.01 | Air quality monitoring and modelling near a lead
works
G. Cosemans1 and E. Roekens2 1 Remote Sensing and Atmospheric processes, Vito, Mol, Belgium 2 Flemish Environmental Agency (VMM), Dept Networks and Research, Aalst, Belgium |
| P.02 | Evaluation of the JH air quality simulation model
for tunnel portals
S. Okamoto1, Y. Hada2, Y. Konno3, K. Kobayashi4 and K. Horiuchi5 1 Tokyo University of Information Sciences, Japan 2 Japan Highway Public Corporation, Japan 3 Research Institute of Japan Highway Public Corporation, Japan 4 Japan Environment Management Association of Industry, Japan 5 Chiyoda Engineering Consultants Co Ltd, Japan |
| P.04 | Comparison of ADMS-Roads, CALINE and UK DMRB model
predictions for roads
K. Ellis, C. McHugh and S. Dyster, CERC, Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants Ltd., Cambridge, UK |
| P.05 | Evaluation of the UK-ADMS buildings effects module
using data on the near-field dispersion of ammonia at an intensive dairy
farm
R.A. Hill1, R. Parkinson2, B.F. Pain3, V.R. Philips4 and I. Lowles1 1 Westlakes Scientific Consulting Ltd, Cumbria, UK 2 Dept of Agriculture and Food studies, University of Plymouth, Devon, UK 3 Institute of Grassland and Agricultural Research, Okehampton, Devon, UK 4 Silsoe Research Institute, Bedford, UK |
| P.06 | Modeling PBL turbulence parameters by neutral network
to improve meteo stations
P. Agnello, C. Gariazzo and A. Pelliccione, Italian Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (ISPESL), Roma, Italy |
|
Urban scale and street canyon modelling: meteorology and air quality |
|
| 4.01 | Application of ADMS-Urban to a large area: Model
sensitivity to selected input parameters
B. Owen, Atmospheric Research and Information Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK |
| 4.02 | The UDM. A Model for Estimating Dispersion in Urban
Areas
D.J. Hall1, A.M. Spanton1, I.H. Griffiths2, M. Hargrave3 and S. Walker4 1 Envirobods Ltd, Stevenage, Herts, UK 2 DERA Porton Down, Salisbury, UK 3 Riskaware Ltd, Bristol, UK 4 BRE Ltd, Graston, Watford, Herts, UK |
| 4.03 | Adaptation of results from CFD-models and wind-tunnels
for practical traffic pollution modelling
M. Ketzel1, R. Berkowicz1, T. Flassak2, A. Lohmeyer2, P. Kastner-Klein3, B. Leitl4 and M. Schatzmann4 1 NERI, National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark 2 Lohmeyer Consulting Engineers, Radebeul, Germany 3 Institute for Climate Research, ETH Zürich, Switzerland 4 Meteorological Institute, University of Hamburg, Germany |
| 4.04 | The effect of roughness obstacles on flow and dispersion
in urban and industrial areas
S.R. Hanna1 and R. Britter2 1 CSI, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA 2 Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK |
| 4.05 | Determination of the “non exhaust pipe” PM10 emissions
of roads for practical traffic air pollution modelling
A. Gamez1. R. Berkowicz2, M. Ketzel2, A. Lohmeyer1 and W. Reichenbächer3 1 Lohmeyer Consulting Engineers, Radebeul, Germany 2 NERI, National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark 3 Senatverwaltung fuer Stadtentwicklung, Berlin, Germany |
| 4.06 | Some interesting phenomena on air pollutant dispersion
in urban street canyons
J. Xia and Y.C. Leung, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China |
| 4.07 | Modelling vehicle-generated atmospheric pollutant in a quartier of Lyon using the model SIRANEL. Soulhac, P. Méjean and R.J. Perkins, Laboratoire de Mécanique des fluides et d’Acoustique, Ecole Centrale Lyon, Ecully, France |
| 4.08 | Preparation of meteorological input data for urban
site studies
B. Fisher1, M. Schatzmann2 and J. Brechler3 1 Environment Agency, NCRAOA, London, UK 2 Meteorological Insyitute, University of Hamburg, Germany 3 Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic |
| 4.09 | Modelling of propagation of the hazardous impurities
emitted by automobiles in traffic jams
V.V. Kondrashov and V.P. Reshetin, Institute of Radiation Physics and Chemistry Problems, National Academy of Science of Belarus, Sosny-Minsk, Belarus |
| 4.10 | A screening model for the calculation of pollutant
accumulation in street canyons
A. Coppalle1 and B. Abart2 1 UMR, CORIA, INSA, Saint Etienne du Rouvray, France 2 SIRIA Technology, Villeneuve d’Asq, France |
| 4.11 | CFD intercomparison on a full-scale street-canyon
P. Louka1,2, M. Ketzel3, E. Guilloteau4, N. Moussiopoulos2 and J.F. Sini1 1 Ecole Centrale de Nantes, Laboratoire Energétique et Environnement, Nantes, France 2 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 NERI, National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark 4 Institute of Hydromechanics, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany |
| 4.12 | Modelling of concentration fluctuations
S. Andronopoulos1, D. Grigoriadis1, A. Robbins2, A. Venetsanos1, S. Rafalidis1 and J.G. Bartzis1 1 NCSR Demokritos, Environmental Research Laboratory, Greece 2 University of Surrey, Environmental Flow Research Centre, UK |
| P.01 | A refined modelling system for estimating the emissions,
dispersion, chemical transformation and dry deposition of traffic-originated
pollution from a road
J. Härkönen, J. Nikmo, A. Karppinen and J. Kukkonen, Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Helsinki, Finland |
| P.02 | Effects of congested vs Freeway urban traffic flow
on air pollutant concentrations in street canyon
M. Zickus and A. Greig, Dept of Geography, Anglia Polytechnic University, Cambridge, UK |
| P.04 | Sensitivity of DAUMOD (urban diffusion model) calculated
air pollutant concentrations to the internal boundary layer parameterisation,
surface roughness length and atmospheric stability
L.E. Venegas and N.A. Mazzeo, Det of Atmospheric Sciences and the Oceans, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina |
| P.05 | Ultra low emitting vehicles and air quality in urban
areas
N. Moussiopoulos1, T. Nitis1, P.M. Tourlou1, P. Sahm1 and Y. Yamamoto2 1 Laboratory of Heat and Environmental Engineering, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece 2 Honda R&D CO Ltd, Tochigi, Japan |
| P.06 | Three-dimensional numerical modelling of dispersion
of atmospheric pollutant in a finite array of square buildings
V. Assimakopoulos1,2, P. Sahm1, H. ApSimon1 and N. Moussiopoulos2 1 Air Pollution Group, T.H. Huxley School, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK 2 Laboratory of Heat and Environmental Engineering, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece |
|
Meso-scale modelling and air quality modelling |
|
| 5.01 | Investigation of a UK sulphur dioxide episode –
2nd September 1998
A.L. Redington, H.N. Webster, G. Marsh and D.B. Ryall, UK MetOffice, Bracknell, UK |
| 5.02 | Improving a complex chemistry-transport model by
advanced optimization techniques
H. Elbern, Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany |
| 5.03 | An operational model for air quality simulations
in the Campania region
G. Barone, P. D’Ambra, G. Giunta, R. Montella, A. Murli and A. Riccio, Dept of Chemistry, University of Naples “Frederico II”, Naples, Italy Center for Research on parallel Computing & Supercomputers, CNR, Naples, ItalyInstitute of Mathematics, Physics and Applications, Naval Institute, Naples, Italy |
| 5.04 | Modelling of Atmospheric pollutant dispersion in
complex terrain – Part I: Development, validation and comparison of a higher-order
closure mesoscale model
M. Mohr1, L. Enger1 and B.J. Abiodun2 1 Dept of Meteorology, University of Uppsala, Sweden 2 Dept of Meteorology, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria |
| 5.05 | Modelling of Atmospheric pollutant dispersion in
complex terrain – Part II: Development, validation and comparison of a
higher-order closure dispersion model
B.J. Abiodun2 , L. Enger1 and M. Mohr1 1 Dept of Meteorology, University of Uppsala, Sweden 2 Dept of Meteorology, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria |
| 5.06 | Ozone episode in Milan metropolitan area – UAM –V/CALGRID
nesting approach
G. Carizi1, C. Gariazzo2, F. Polla Mattiot2 and M. Volta31 Aquater, San Lorenzo in Campo, Italy2 EniTecnologie SpA, Monterotondo, Rome, Italy3 DEA, Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy |
| 5.07 | Development of a computer system for control and
prevention of air pollution in Valencia Port, Spain
S.N. Crespí1, I. Palomino1, F. Martín1, A. Guerra2, D. Gomis3 1 Dept of Environmental Impact of Energy, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain 2 Puertos del Estado, Madrid, Spain 3 Soltek, Bacelona, Spain |
| 5.08 | Air quality modelling with the EURAD model
M. Memmesheimer1, H.J. Jakobs1, G. Piekorz1, A. Ebel1, M. Kerschgens1, E. Friese1, H. Feldmann1 and H. Geiß2 1 EURAD, University of Cologne, Germany 2 ICG2, Research Centre Jülich, Germany |
| 5.09 | Estimation of boundary layer parameters for dispersion
calculation using outputs from numerical weather prediction models
G. Omstedt, SMHI, Sweden |
| 5.10 | Meso-scale fluxes – towards a meteorological pre-processor
E. Batchvarova1,2 and S.E. Gryning1 1 Wind Energy Department, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark 2 National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria |
| 5.11 | Simulation of a diffusion experiment in neutral
conditions over gentle topography
E. Ferrero1,2, S. Trini Castelli1,2 and D. Anfossi2 1 Dip. Di Scienze e Tecnologie Avanzat, University of Alessandria, Italy 2 Ist. Di Cosmogeofisica CNR, Torino, Italy |
| 5.12 | An extraordinary ozone episode in Madrid (April,
2000) during night time: a modelling study
R. San José1, A. Stohl2, K. Karatzas3, T. Bohler4, P. James2 and I. Salas1 1 Environmental Software and Modelling Group, Computer Science School, Technical University of Madrid, Spain 2 Dept of Ecology, Technical University of Munich, Germany 3 Environmental Consultant, Thessaloniki, Greece4 Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Norway |
| 5.13 | Application of a langrangian model to investigate
patterns of radionuclides dispersion over complex terrain – Part 1: Local
circulation and low-level jet.
H.A. Karam, A.P.Oliveira and M.M.R. Pereira, Group of Micrometeorology, Dept of Atmospheric Sciences, IAG-USP, São Paulo, Brazil |
| 5.14 | Application of a langrangian model to investigate
patterns of radionuclides dispersion over complex terrain – Part 2: The
impact of low-level jet in the concentration field
M.M.R. Pereira, A.P.Oliveira and H.A. Karam, Group of Micrometeorology, Dept of Atmospheric Sciences, IAG-USP, São Paulo, Brazil |
| 5.15 | Analysis of the middle range transportation of the
aerosol from Cubatão by means of a modelling system for complex
terrain
A.A.F. Sansigolo Kerr1,2, D. Anfossi2, J.da Costa Carvalho2,3, S. Finardi4, S. Trini Castelli2 1 Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil 2 Istituto di CosmoGeofisica CNR, Torino, Italy 3 Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil 4 CESI Ambiente, Segrate (Mi), Italy |
| P.01 | Diurnal cycles in the western Mediterranean and
associate long-range transport of pollutants during the European RECAPMA
project
G. Gangoiti, Millán M. Millán, R. Salvador and E. Mantilla CEAM Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo, Valencia, Spain |
| P.02 | Model simulations of industrial plumes over the
Puglia region
U. Rizza, C. Mangia, M. Miglietta, P. Martano and I. Schipa Istituto per lo Studio dell’Inquinamento Atmosferico a l’Agrometeorologia, ISIATA/CNR, Lecce, Italy |
| P.03 | The simulation of non explosive volcanic emissions:
the case of the SO2 from the Etna crater
M. Favalli1, G. Graziani2, M.T. Pareschi1 and M. Ranci1 1 CSGSDA-CNR, Pisa, Italy 2 JRC-EI, Ispra, Italy |
| P.04 | Use of a diagnostic model with the information derived from mesoscale
calculations to reproduce the circulation in complex terrain: an application
to the area of Bolzano
A. Levy and G. Carizi, Aquater SpA – S. Lorenzo in Campo (PU), Italy |
|
Environmental Impact Assessment: Air pollution management and decision support systems |
|
| 6.01 | On the determination of the 99.8 percentile of NO2
concentrations required by the directive 99/30/EC: A case study
D. Oettl, R.A. Almbauer and P.J. Sturm, Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria |
| 6.02 | The spatial and temporal variation of the exposure
of population to ambient air pollution in Helsinki
A. Karppinen1, J. Kukkonen1, M. Pohjola1, A. Kousa2, P. Aarnio2 and T. Koskentalo2 1 Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Air Quality Research, Helsinki, Finland 2 Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council (YTV), Helsinki, Finland |
| 6.03 | The effects of land use and transportation investment on travel related
greenhouse gas production in two regions of the United States
L.D. Frank and B.Stone, College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA |
| 6.04 | Regulatory air dispersion models for long term risk assessment
J.L.Thé1 and J.A. Secrest2 1 Lakes Environmental Software, Waterloo, Canada 2 The Air Group, Dallas, Texas, USA |
| 6.05 | Meteorological nowcasting for an environmental emergency
decision support system
M.G. Longoni1, G. Maffeis1, A. De Martini2 and N. Quaranta2 1 TERRARIA SRL, Milano, Italy 2 Ufficio Prevenzione Rischi, Protezione Civile, Regione Lombardia, Milano, Italy |
| 6.07 | Dose assessment after an explosive dispersion of
radioactive material in urban surroundings. A decision support system for
use by radiation protection authorities
H. Walter, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Oberschleissheim, Germany |
| 6.08 | A chemical mass balance approach for impact assessment
in urban areas
P. Buttini and F. Polla Mattiot, EniTecnologie SpA, Monterotondo, Roma, Italy |
| P.01 | Air quality modelling in urban regions using an
optimal resolution approach (AURORA)
C. Mensink, K. De Ridder, N. Lewyckyj, L. Delobbe, L. Kinnaer and L. Janssen, VITO, Centre for Remote Sensing and Atmospheric processes, Mol, Belgium |
| P.02 | A modelling system for the management of traffic-related
air pollution in an urban area
E. Nava and S.P. Angius, Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente dealla Lombardia, Brescia, Italy |
| P.03 | Study of the impact of urban air quality on Human
health based in a children population – proposal for a model
J. Garcia1, L.M.R. Coelho1, C. Simão2 and M.G. Carvalho3 1 Escola Superior de Tecnologia de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal 2 Hospital Na.Sa. do Rosário, Serviçio de Pediatria, Barreiro, Portugal 3 Instituto superior Téctico, Dept de Engenharia Mecânica, Lisboa, Portugal |
| P.04 | The management of devaluated autocats and air quality
variations in Athens
A.G. Paliasos1, J.K. Kaldellis2 and L.G. Viras3 1 General Dept of Mathematics, TEI Piraeus, Greece 2 Lab of SEA & Envi.Pro, Mechanical Emg.Dept, TEI Pireaus, Greece 3 Min. Of Environment, Directorate of Air and Noise Pollution Control, Greece |
| P.05 | A model approach in risk assessment: A case study
in the industrial area of Porto Marghera, Venice
A. Benassi1, F. Liguori1, G. Maffeis2 and L. Susanetti1 1 ARPAV, Osservatorio Aria, Mestre Venezia, Italy 2 TerrAria srl, Milano, Italy |
| P.07 | On-line model of atmospheric transport to estimate
and forecast radiation accident consequences
N.V. Klepikova, N.I. Troyanova, G.N. Freimundt and V.A. Denkin, Federal Environmental Emergency Response Centre of Roshydromet, SPA “TYPHOON”, Russia |
| P.08 | Sensitivity study of influence of input parameters
variations for removal processes calculations on activity depletion in
the radioactive plume and deposition on the ground
P. Pecha1 and E. Pechova2 1 Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Prague, Czech Rep. 2 ENERGOPROJEKT, Prague, Czech Rep. |
| P.09 | Development of a two-dimensional street canyon model
S. Karathanasis, P. Simeonidis and I. Ziomas, Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece |
